Theorising representation in the Māori seats: The crucial role of accountability
Resource type
Authors/contributors
- Nissen, Sylvia (Author)
- MacDonald, Lindsey Te Ata o Tu (Author)
Title
Theorising representation in the Māori seats: The crucial role of accountability
Abstract
The guaranteed Mäori seats are a distinguishing and controversial feature of New Zealand’s democracy. In recent years, a number of reports, commentators and politicians have called for the seats to be abolished on the grounds that they are no longer “needed” in New Zealand’s proportional electoral system. These claims are usually grounded in principles of equality. This paper makes the opposite claim: that principles of equality create convincing and coherent justifications for the Mäori seats. Drawing on feminist theories of representation, particularly the work of Iris Marion Young, Melissa Williams and Anne Phillips, this paper argues that the Mäori seats provide crucial mechanisms of accountability that ensure the fidelity of Mäori representatives to their constituencies. This notion of accountability has been largely absent in debates about the Mäori seats and challenges arguments against the seats that are based solely on perceived “need” relative to proportionate presence.
Publication
MAI Journal: A New Zealand Journal of Indigenous Scholarship
Date
2017
Volume
6
Issue
2
Journal Abbr
MAI Journal
Accessed
12/14/22, 6:57 AM
Short Title
Theorising representation in the Māori seats
Language
en
Library Catalog
DOI.org (Crossref)
Citation
Nissen, S., & MacDonald, L. T. A. o T. (2017). Theorising representation in the Māori seats: The crucial role of accountability. MAI Journal: A New Zealand Journal of Indigenous Scholarship, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.20507/MAIJournal.2017.6.2.5
Topic
Link to this record