Conceptualising historical privilege: the flip side of historical trauma, a brief examination

Resource type
Authors/contributors
Title
Conceptualising historical privilege: the flip side of historical trauma, a brief examination
Abstract
Historical trauma is an important and growing area of research that provides crucial insights into the antecedents of current-day inequities in health and social wellbeing experienced by Indigenous people in colonial settler societies. What is not so readily examined is the flip side of historical trauma experienced by settlers and their descendants, what might be termed ?historical privilege?. These historic acts of privilege for settlers, particularly those emigrating from Britain, provide the antecedents for the current-day realities for their descendants and the structural, institutional and interpersonal levels of advantage that are also a key feature of inequities between Indigenous and settler. This article theorises an explicit link between historical trauma and historical privilege and explores how the latter may be examined with particular reference to Aotearoa New Zealand. Three core elements of historical trauma are posited as a useful framework to apply to historical privilege.
Publication
AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples
Date
2018-03-01
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
25-34
Accessed
12/15/22, 9:55 AM
ISSN
1177-1801
Short Title
Conceptualising historical privilege
Language
en
Library Catalog
SAGE Journals
Notes

Bens rational: This article discusses the concept of historical trauma and hIstorical previlege through colonisation. How is this defined? “This article has begun to examine and frame how an understanding of privilege, that is equivalent to the decolonising power of the concept of historical trauma, may be described”

Citation
Borell, B., Moewaka Barnes, H., & McCreanor, T. (2018). Conceptualising historical privilege: the flip side of historical trauma, a brief examination. AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples, 14(1), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/1177180117742202