Your search
Results 7 resources
-
"Collection of 17 essays from Māori scholars which cover customary law, ancestral law, the natural world, Māori urban protest, health, politics, and customary language and expression"--Publisher's information.
-
Aotearoa/New Zealand is not known for egregious breaches of indigenous peoples’ rights. Nonetheless, New Zealand’s legal system is ineffective at implementing international and domestic laws that protect the rights of Maori. This has been seen most starkly in the Foreshore and Seabed Act of 2004, which had the effect of extinguishing Maori aboriginal title to the foreshore and seabed areas and was passed despite almost universal Maori opposition.
-
Describes, from the perspective of the advocates for Maori claimants, the substance of submissions to and process followed by the United Nations committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD) in determining that the Foreshore and Seabed Act 2004 discriminates against Maori. Source: National Library of New Zealand Te Puna Matauranga o Aotearoa, licensed by the Department of Internal Affairs for re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 New Zealand Licence.
-
The State of Maori Rights brings together a set of articles written between 1994 and 2009. It places on record the Maori view of events and issues that took place over these years, issues that have been more typically reported to the general public from a 'mainstream' media perspective. It is an important documentation of these fifteen years of New Zealand history, recording the assertion of Maori rights as the indigenous people of Aotearoa New Zealand, focusing on Maori issues and experiences and written from a Maori perspective.
-
The Foreshore and Seabed Act 2004 caused many New Zealanders grave concern. In this article I suggest that a number of the Government's actions since the passing of the Foreshore and Seabed Act bring into question several of its central claims for legislating and the subsequent overriding of Tiriti o Waitangi and human rights laws. As a result, I argue that the inadequacy in our constitutional arrangements requires a change of approach—a new game plan: constitutional change. The second part of the article examines the work of the Maori Party. Its actions in encouraging an increasing level of Maori politicisation away from expression outside the State and towards the electoral process, arising out of opposition to the Foreshore and Seabed Act, constitute another changing of game plans. The article concludes by emphasising how the Foreshore and Seabed Act has encouraged us to take a longer term vision in order to foster more positive relations, a vision that encompasses the need for genuine constitutional change based on respect for human rights and Te Tiriti o Waitangi.
Explore
Topic
- foreshore and seabed act 2004
- civil Rights (3)
- colonisation (1)
- constitution (1)
- constitutional transformation (1)
- crown law (1)
- crown policy (2)
- crown violence (1)
- discrimination (1)
- government relations (2)
- hapū (1)
- hikoi ki waitangi (1)
- history (1)
- human rights (1)
- institutional racism (1)
- intergenerational trauma (1)
- international law (1)
- international organization (1)
- iwi (1)
- kaitiakitanga (1)
- kāwanatanga (2)
- land march (1)
- land rights (1)
- land tenure (1)
- mana motuhake (1)
- māori electorates (1)
- māori rights (1)
- māori womens welfare league (1)
- nga tamatoa (1)
- parihaka (1)
- parliament (1)
- political activity (1)
- poverty (1)
- protest (2)
- race relations (1)
- racism (4)
- rangatiratanga (1)
- resistance (1)
- social conditions (1)
- springbok tour protests (1)
- takaparawhau bastion point (1)
- tāngata whenua (1)
- te pāti māori (2)
- tikanga | indigenous law (1)
- tiriti o waitangi/treaty of waitangi (3)
- treaty obligations (1)
- treaty settlements (1)
- urbanisation (1)
- voting (1)
- waitangi tribunal (1)
Resource type
- Book (1)
- Book Section (1)
- Journal Article (4)
- Web Page (1)